FOREIGN
RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES CIRCA 2015
(FRAZER
CHRONICLE)
(All
the News That Nobody Else Will Print)
Foreign relations between
the United States and other countries varies from excellent to worse than poor.
When the United States makes treaties with other nations, or when it sends
ambassadors abroad, it is practicing foreign policy. And as we all should know, US foreign
policy’s main goal is to preserve and strengthen the position of the United
States as an independent and sovereign nation…..in other words, secure and maintain the best possible
position for American business.
In my younger days I was
foolish enough to think that the United States was fighting to give other
countries freedom and the chance for prosperity…..for all the people. It was
kind of the old axiom, “when I was young
I thought as a young person, and as I grew older…..I became more cynical”.
I long for those days of youth and innocence, you remember, when things were
easy, and what you didn’t quite grasp, you passed on to somebody else to worry
about.
It is pretty much an
excepted opinion that the United States actually created some of the terrorism organizations that not only the United
States is dealing with, but the rest of those countries that are allied with
the US, and even those that are not.
Terrorism is a word that is
used in everyday news story, and the term is used to describe everything from
gorilla style warfare against U.S. troops overseas to the mass murder of
civilians in the name of ideological and political agendas. Also today, due to
the US political context, most Americans automatically associate terrorism with
radical right-wing Islamic extremism.
The United States government
and military uses semantics in every news release that is aired, whether on the
radio or television, and is written in newspapers. Terrorists don’t execute
prisoners, they murder them, terrorists don’t militarily invade an enemy, they
commit terrorist’s acts and threaten peace loving individuals. Without exceptions
terrorists are pictured in black garb and masks to hide their identity while
the US and her allies are shown in a more favorable light.
TALK
ABOUT SEMANTICS
There are so many talking
points about the war on terror, so many people watching, listening, and then
throwing in their own opinion (like me) that
a politician, or somebody in the private sector needs to be aware of what he
says…..pretty much because whatever you say just might be targeted and made an
exception of.
It’s exactly what happened
to President Obama at the National Prayer Breakfast when he suggested we get
off our “high horse”, reminding the
audience that the West had its own history of “terrible deeds” in the name of religion, including the Crusades,
the Inquisition and slavery.
Of course the remarks touched
off a predictable firestorm, and critics pounced, including cry-baby” look-alike Ted Cruz. “Words like radical Islamic terrorism do not
come out of the president’s mouth. The word jihad does not come out of
the president’s mouth…..and that is dangerous”.
And there were others,
Republicans and conservatives all who came forward to bash the president, they
were the usual suspects who seem to be waiting in the wings to jump out and
attack whenever some liberal Democrat makes a slip of the lip and says
something stupid. President Obama is not stupid, just kind of outspoken, careless,
and full of himself…..in other words, he’s normal like the rest of us.
There are so many
misconceptions about what a terrorist is, or why they actually would rather
blow themselves to smithereens, and in the process take out four, five, or
twenty civilians, that is unfathomable for most people in the West to grasp
much less understand.
But the verbiage that one
uses…..anyone, is inconsequential, these people, mostly Muslims, just use the
words to justify their means. Many, many of these people are misguided, are
being manipulated and taken advantage of. President Obama could have said “red rover, red rover let Joey come over”,
and some terrorists sitting someplace could have taken exception, and either
strapped himself with bombs, or wired somebody else so that somebody could have blown some infidels up…..it’s mostly how
they operate.
You see I don’t believe that
we here in the United States are really at war, if we were really at war efforts
would be balls to the walls. It’s
what happened in 1917-18, and again in late 1941, it’s the United States
Modus-operandi, we take some crap, debate one with the other, and when
something happens, and the United States raises up and doesn’t take any names,
the United States just goes out and kicks butt.
And sadly this “kicking butt” does not take into
account whether the cause is right or wrong, US citizens only know that there
is a threat, it has to be dealt with…..so by
God, get the lead out, and let’s get at the business of war. Semitics down
at the end of the road has very little to do with how the United States reacts
to a threat.
MODERN
TERRORISTS
Without exception down
through the annuals of human history the acts of terrorism have been practiced
and actually refined. Massacre is another word for terrorism and every country
on the face of the planet has practiced the act during their history.
Russia during its time of
civil disobedience, Germany during the 1st and 2nd world
wars, Japan on many occasions, France, Great Britain, Australia and of course
the United States. Each country, plus hundreds more used the brutal practices
of human degradation as a tool of fear, genocide and control.
The United States is no
better or worse throughout its history for how they have dealt with their
enemies as well as those undesirables that were living in the continual United
States. What has been worse, at least as far as the United States actions are
concerned is the fact that powers that be felt that they were entitled to act
in a terroristic manner because they were freeing people, or protecting their
(US) property or natural resource extraction.
It was the late 1960’s that
the modern international terrorists got their start, when the Palestinian
secular movements such as Al Fatah and the Popular Front for the Liberation of
Palestine, (PFLP) began to target civilians outside the immediate area of
conflict.
It was during this time
that, in 1967, after the defeat by Israel forces of Arab forces, Palestine
leaders realized that that the Arab world was unable to militarily confront Israel.
At the same time there was lessons learned from revolutionary movements in
Latin America, Southeast Asia as well as during the Jewish struggle against
Britain in Palestine, saw the Palestinians move away from classic guerrilla,
typically rural-based warfare toward urban Terrorism. Radical Palestinians took
advantage of modern communications and transportation systems to
internationalize their struggle. They launched a series of highjackings,
kidnappings, bombings and shootings, culminating with the killings at the
Olympic Games in Munich in 1972.
From 1972 on the words”terrorism, terror, or terrorists” begin
to make the small hairs on the necks of security officials throughout the world
stand up on end. The making of terrorists,
or a terror cell was born out of necessity, and most everybody knows what happens
when something is a necessity…..you sometimes get the mother of all inventions.
HOW
DOES THIS ALL TIE IN WITH UNITED STATES FOREIGN POLICY?
Glad you asked the question,
it proves that you’re reading my blog. What do you think would happen if every
single American military installation pulled up stakes, and returned home to
the United States…..bag and baggage?
That question is easy to
answer…..war for the United States would be over, we could sleep in, and
believing that every day was like Saturday. We could put a huge 30’ high fence
around our boarders, keeping all the immigrants locked out…..so folks, we got
to first take care of our own…..it’s our new prime directive!
Military people would have
to be assimilated back into normal society, while some, in critical positions
would remain as a skeleton crews, serving as active soldiers, say maybe 500,000.
These people would maintain military machinery, or putting the war wagons into moth-balls.
It would be…..it could be
the most exciting time in the history of the United States, everybody would
benefit from the fruits of their labor…..because everybody that was able to
work, would. “What, huh,” do I hear a dissenter in the crowd, do I hear about
our enemies, about jobs, about international trade, about our criminal element,
about terrorists plots which involved our allies, do I hear something like…..”where will everybody work”. Again, glad
you asked that question.”
Number 1 our enemies won’t
be our enemies cause we won’t be threatening them anymore with our foreign policies. Number 2 jobs,
well gee pal; we could finally as a people develop our assets to their fullest
potential. The United States of America has been bestowed with a bountiful abundance
of natural resources of all types…..plenty for everybody to flourish on, and
work to harvest some of that bountiful resource. Number 3, international trade,
it could continue, but more on a level playing field, and be strictly operated
by whatever our Federal Government finally looked like.
And finally our criminal
element, sadly that would remain; there are of course some bad parts in any
dream. But one of the things that we would have to clean up would be that
criminal side of our society. But on the bright side, there would be more jobs
where people could work, and for some, that work chance might just tip the
scales of crime.
Look at me; here I started
out wanting to berate the United States foreign policies, and the apparatus
that administers it. I have little left to say with regards to the current
practice, and the reasons for how foreign policies are taken care of…..and by whom.
If we ceased to have embassies,
if we ceased to have ambassadors, and if we discontinued to honor, or make
treaties with our allies, and if we started to treat all people with dignity and respect we could actually rewrite how
people view the United States of America…..now wouldn’t that be something!
HAVE
A NICE DAY!