OH
NO NOT ANOTHER WAR THREAT AGAINST THE U.S.
(Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel, Reuters, Alexander to Actium)
(Peter
Green, Charles Liebman, Frank Cass, Huff Post, Max Rosenthal)
(U.S.News
World Report, Brian M. Jenkins, Jocelyn Coulon, Thomas Grant)
(Thomas
G. Weiss, Sam Daws, William Manchester, Frank Newport, The Atlantic)
(David
Rohde, CIA World Fact Book, Kenneth R. Timmerman, Hurriyet Dailey, Frazer
Chronicle)
For
a country that seemingly has its military issues “all in a row,” with unending war machines, military, and
the funds to make it all work, we sure seem to be threatened by a whole host of enemies. I kind
of thought it strange that we, the United States, could be so challenged by a
country that named its largest city after a dog food, Aleppo and was
part of a country, Ottoman Empire, that was named after a piece of
furniture, a foot-stool.
I
will give Syria this, they sure as hell know how to rustle up a bunch of hassle
with what must have been perceived as their superiors, after the dissolution of the Ottoman Syrian
Empire in 1918, Syria became known as the Arab
Kingdom of Syria. Periodically since the 1920’s, Syria has been involved in
all sorts of skirmishes with their neighbors.
To
think that Syria would be a soft touch in any kind of military confrontation
would be foolhardy indeed, the country has been fighting wars since 274 B.C. However one should quantify here, any military struggle
with Syria and the United States would not be with the Syrian armed forces,
which number a mere 178,000, rather some of the extremists, like the Al-Nusra Front, Hezbollah, Hamas,
Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Abu Musa Organization that operate in
the country.
Of
course the United States has a foreign policy in Syria just like in a hundred
other countries, I’m not exactly sure what that policy is, but critics argue
that what is going on in the country, should not come as a surprise. For years
detractors of the Obama policy in Syria have predicted that Bashar al – Assad (Syrian President)
and his Iranian and Russian backers
would fight tenaciously; militants would flock to Syria; and the region would
be destabilized by refugee flows, raising sectarianism, and radicalized
fighters returning home.
JAMES
CLAPPER, THE “OLD BALD EAGLE”
James
R. Clapper is the 4th director of Director of National Security, and
is responsible directly to the president’s authority, direction and control.
The director of National Security serves as the principle advisor to the
president, the National Security Council, and the Homeland Security Council
about intelligence matters related to national security.
He,
in addition, serves as the head of the sixteen-member Intelligence Community;
and directs and oversees the National Intelligence Program. A presidential
policy directive signed in October 2012 further gave the Director of National
Security the responsibility of whistle blowing and source protection through
policy directive 19.
Clapper is
a 71 year old graduate of Maryland College, St. Mary’s University, and the
National Defense Air University. Clapper is a (1963-1995) retired Lieutenant
General from the U.S. Air Force. Clapper was the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence from April 2007 to June
2010, and assumed his current office of Director
of National Intelligence August 9, 2010.
In
addition, Clapper also served as the Director
of the National Geospatial, which is…..an approach to applying statistical
analysis and other information techniques to data which has a geographical or
geospatial aspect. Aren’t you happy that
I looked the word…..geospatial up,
in the case of the U.S.’s use of geospatial
information…..defense, and intelligence gathering is what it’s used for…..are
you surprised?
Why
do I list this information, glad you asked, I think that it is important to
understand exactly who is responsible to man certain areas of our government.
James R. Clapper ain’t a dog catcher, what he says, and the opinions that he
has, and how he presents it to his boss, President
Barrack Obama can have a huge impact on how our country proceeds in foreign
policies.
A
graphic example of how important a person with the authority and the ability to
influence key personal in government was illustrated when Clapper gave contradicting
and erroneous information in 2013 during a United States Senate Select
Committee on intelligence hearings. You’ll recall the issue of whether the National Security Agency was eves
dropping on American citizens phone calls and he said, “Absolutely not.” Well that
answer was ABSOLUTELY A LIE.
Needless to say, the Director of National Intelligence can’t be trusted.
WE
NOW NEED TO FACE ANOTHER MILITARY AND TERRORIST THREAT
What
is happening in Syria is conjecture
pure and simple, with little exception all intelligence information is a study
in guesswork. These people that our elected officials appoint to do the job of
gathering intelligence information DO
have a tough job, and many times it is a thankless job most of the time because…..when
they do their jobs, we don’t hear about it, that’s the mark of a successful intelligence department.
However
I am not naive enough to understand that those people, who depend on projected
altercations for job security, might
stir the pot to muddy the waters of clarity which our elected officials
need to make the proper rational decisions that best serve the country.
I
also know that intelligence personal…key intelligence personal…in every
department of the governmental spook agencies aren’t above fabricating
the occasional disturbing situation that’ll help to keep the waters muddied.
We
now come full circle to Syria…..and the perceived
threat that the country posses against the United States. Let’s look at a few
facts and figures as to why some Syrian fractions pose such a threat to our
country…..this won’t take long:
A. Distance from Damascus,
Syria to Green Bay, Wisconsin…..6,019 miles
B. Population, 20,820,311
C. Military size, 178,000
D. Tanks, 4,150
E. Fighting vehicles, (all)
6,300
F. Aircraft, 695
G. Naval Power, (85) total
boats
H. Defense budget,
$2,500,000,000
The
above, according to some in U.S. intelligence, political conservatives, and
intelligence and military departments see Syria as a threat, the severity of
the threat…..I’m not sure…..but here’s what Syria would be confronted with in a
military confrontation with the United States:
A. Population, 313,847,465
B. Military size, (active
and reserve) 2,000,000 and more
C. Tanks, 8,325
D. Fighting vehicles, (all)
22,000
E. Aircraft, 15,293
F. Naval power, 473 total
ships
G. Defense budget, $611
billion
Now
I ask you…..exactly how much of a threat is Syrian freedom fighters, or Syrian
military, or President Bashar al-Assad? When our political and military leaders
want to sit down and realistically talk about threats to the U.S. in the world
today…..let me know.
HAVE
A NICE DAY!
No comments:
Post a Comment